This afternoon, after lunch, I have decided to walk by and take a quick look at my favourite vintage watch shop and i saw a watch that looks like a 1601. Upon closer examination, I then realised that it is a 6305, which is a big Bubbleback ref 6305 from Q1 1955. I have decided to trade away my handwind Rolex ref 6082 and consolidate my Big Bubbleback collection.
The Rolex Datejust in stainless steel remains to be one of the most popular vintage watch requests we get on a daily basis, and we can see why. It’s beautifully designed and completely wearable in any setting without being ostentatious. The Rolex 6305 was in production from 1953-56 before being replaced by ref 6604, 6605 using the Rolex Buttlefly movements cal 1030. etc
Much of the design ethos remains the same for the Datejust since its debut in 1945. Rolex patented the Cyclops in early 1953, and featured it on the Datejust. This curved lens, put on the crystal at 3 o'clock (or at 9 o'clock in the case of GMT Master II) above the window, made viewing the date easier. This Datejust ref. 6305 from 1955 Q1, is especially charming, as it still has an overall hybrid feel between the Rolex Bubbleback and Datejust models.
The case measures 36mm, which is a universally appealing size for modern wear for both men and women This particular watch is even more special because of its dial. It bears the so-called OCC inscription ("OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED CHRONOMETER"), which can only be found on early Rolex specimens. In addition, the dial features an alternating black and red date disc and is one of the very first roulette dials in watchmaking history.
This Datejust still features an old finely fluted coin edged bezel gives it some extra pizazz. In the mid-1950s, the change over to the wide fluted bezel took place. Thus, this Datejust is one of the last watches with this super-elegant and fine bezel. The best part of this watch is definitely the dial as it still retains its clean look.
The watch come together with its Made in USA bracelet. Originally, I was thinking of just getting the watch without the bracelet. After some consideration, I have decided to keep the watch as it is. Watch has been thoroughly serviced.
In a February 1953 letter, Wilsdorf writes “I am convinced that the new tropical case with the new crystal, and the optical magnification, will give us something new.” In 1955, in light of this conviction, Rolex issued a release published in the press to protect the innovation. The warning to the competition stated: “To all watchmakers: we draw your attention to the fact that the watch crystal with the specially shaped magnifying lens is a Rolex exclusivity protected in Switzerland and abroad. We will not hesitate to instigate legal proceedings against any counterfeiting.”
I am currently waiting to intsal the crown with +
Using A296 Semib bubbleback movement
Another Rolex 6395 rose gold bezel from 1953
The Rolex Big bubbleback series leading to the Datejust consists of the following
Rolex ref 4467 (solid Gold from year 1945-1949)
Rolex ref 5030 (Solid gold) , Bi colour steel and gold 5031, 5075, 6031 (from year 1949 - 1950),
Rolex ref 6075, 6074 (Bi colour from year 1950 - 1953) also some 1960-64
Rolex 6104, 6105 (Bi colour modified A296,from year 1951 - 1953) some from the 1960s
Rolex 6304 , 6305, 6309 (Pre ThunderBird) (A296,from year 1953 - 1956)
Rolex Datejust 6604, 6605, 6609 (Thunderbird), 1600, 1601,1603, 1607, 1625 (Thunderbird) (from 1959 - 1977 onwards using Butterfly movement calibre generation features cal. 1065 and later cal. 1565 and 1575.)
Rolex ref 5030 (Solid gold) , Bi colour steel and gold 5031, 5075, 6031 (from year 1949 - 1950),
Rolex ref 6075, 6074 (Bi colour from year 1950 - 1953) also some 1960-64
Rolex 6104, 6105 (Bi colour modified A296,from year 1951 - 1953) some from the 1960s
Rolex 6304 , 6305, 6309 (Pre ThunderBird) (A296,from year 1953 - 1956)
Rolex Datejust 6604, 6605, 6609 (Thunderbird), 1600, 1601,1603, 1607, 1625 (Thunderbird) (from 1959 - 1977 onwards using Butterfly movement calibre generation features cal. 1065 and later cal. 1565 and 1575.)
No comments:
Post a Comment